https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 Linear deterministic accumulator models of simple choice https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:21581 between-choice noise) dominate the effects of fluctuations occurring while making a choice (within-choice noise) in behavioral data (i.e., response times and choices). The latter deterministic approximation, when combined with the assumption that accumulation is linear, leads to a class of models that can be readily applied to simple-choice behavior because they are computationally tractable. We develop a new and mathematically simple exemplar within the class of linear deterministic models, the Lognormal race (LNR). We then examine how the LNR, and another widely applied linear deterministic model, Brown and Heathcote’s (2008) LBA, account for a range of benchmark simple-choice effects in lexical-decision task data reported by Wagenmakers et al. (2008). Our results indicate that the LNR provides an accurate description of this data. Although the LBA model provides a slightly better account, both models support similar psychological conclusions.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:50:48 AEST ]]> Item effects in recognition memory for words https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:9710 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:31:10 AEST ]]> A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32373 Psychological Review, 111, 159-182, 2004) frameworks, lexical-decisions are based on a continuous source of word-likeness evidence for both words and non-words. The Retrieving Effectively from Memory model of Lexical-Decision (REM-LD; Wagenmakers et al., Cognitive Psychology, 48(3), 332-367, 2004) provides a comprehensive explanation of lexical-decision data and makes the prediction that word-likeness evidence is more variable for words than non-words and that higher frequency words are more variable than lower frequency words. To test these predictions, we analyzed five lexical-decision data sets with the DDM. For all data sets, drift-rate variability changed across word frequency and non-word conditions. For the most part, REM-LD's predictions about the ordering of evidence variability across stimuli in the lexical-decision task were confirmed.]]> Tue 29 May 2018 11:06:59 AEST ]]>